We got on a bus to Kutupalong, the Burmese refugee camp. It was the most claustrophobic bus I’ve ever been on with literally a few inches of space in front of your face before the next seat. The bus ride took two hours. I put a scarf around my hair and a Bangladeshi woman sitting down next to me smiled and said something to me I didn’t understand, but I was glad I somewhat passed for a Bangladeshi. Trust me, in this country, you want to fit in, not stand out.
Once we arrived at the camp, little kids came up to us and spoke in really good English. A taller boy was named Hasan and a shorter boy was named Mohammed. They warned us we may not be allowed inside the camp without a visitor’s pass but they would help us as much as they could.
Just as we were warned, we were stopped by a security guard. We explained to him, though he could barely understand, that we were students unaffiliated with any media or research and visiting purely for personal interest.
He took us to a fairly large but modest private house with a tin-roof and a Land Cruiser parked outside with “UNHCR” painted on it. He called out deferentially to “Sir” and a man stepped outside. He was a Bangladesh civil servant named AFM Fazle Rabbi who had been stationed at the camp for thirteen months.
We explained all over again that we had come to the refugee camp for personal reasons and we wanted to simply walk around, talk to people, and we were not going to use any of this information for media purposes, but he explained that we had to get official permission from the Dhaka city council. We said that we only had a few days left in Cox’s Bazar. We must have looked really dejected because at the end, he relented to letting us interview a refugee in his office.
The camp was founded in 1992. There are currently between 9,586 (officla number) and 14,000 (number stated by Rabbi) refugees currently living in the camp. Over sixty percent are below 18. The birth rate is very high. There is officially no economy inside the camp but refugees get food and non-food rations such as palm, rice, soap, cloths, and kerosene. They receive no vegetables, no meat, and no fish (how do they survive?). They must receive permission to leave the camp and only for the reasons of visiting relatives outside the camp, going to the hospital, or visiting relatives in jail. They grow small gardens next to their house and rear poultry as side activities.
Though the refugees have no permission to work outside, two thousand do illegally. There are 400,000 living illegally outside in the Chittagong Hill Tracts causing strife with indigenous tribes and other areas of Bangladesh.
The problem is that these refugees are not gaining any human capital while they live in the camps. The boys we met were sufficient at English and purely self-taught. They also worked at a computer training center that Microsoft had helped set up in the community, learning Microsoft Word, Powerpoint, and Excel. But developed countries are still not taking in these refugees in large numbers.
There are three ways to deal with refugees, according to Rabbi:
1) Repatriation (not possible because of persecution in Myanmar)
2) Integration (difficult because of Bangladesh’s high population density)
3) Resettlement in a third country (out of eight developed countries that used to accept these refugees, only the USA does now, and only about 60-70 families per year)
The International Office of Migration works with the UNHCR in choosing refugee families with top priority in leaving based on the criterion of vulnerability (social or medical), being efficient and skilled, knowledge of English.
“Why don’t they choose young people who still have a chance at making a new life in a developed country?” I asked.
We were interviewing the taller boy, Hasan Sharif, who was obviously bright and so eager to move to a new country. He said earlier that his ambition was “to be a computer master” and learn “how to develop his society.” He was a Burmese refugee that had been born in Bangladesh.
“What do you consider your society?” we asked him, “Myanmar or Bangladesh?”
“I was born in Bangladesh but my home country is Myanmar,” he said.
We ended the interview and left since it was prayer time for Mr. Rabbi, but as we were walking on the road, the smaller boy Mohammed came and whispered if we wanted to see the refugee camp from the outside, from a different route.
“Yeah, we want to,” we said.
So though we had no express government permission, we technically didn’t break any rules, and we saw the refugee camp from within a foot around its border. There was no fence so for all purposes, we did visit the camp. Children ran around us as we walked past the straw huts and we walked into an unofficial part of the camp.
It was a new level of poor conditions. The whole place was built on a mud hill. People lived en masse in run-down huts and there was barely any economy within the camp. Things looked in one word, static. Children had weird marks on their faces.
We were escorted back out by our two young unofficial tour guides, who took us to the bus stop. Mohammed, the younger one, kept asking us to visit the computer lab so he can get our pictures, but he ended up hopping onto our bus and heading to Cox’s Bazar with us.
We bought him lunch at Mermaid Cafe, which ended up being the most ostentatious place in Cox’s Bazar, one of those places in Bangladesh that relish in being expensive just so they can look legitimate to foreign tourists that expect to burn money on a vacation. Mohammed didn’t like the food. It was a little awkward simply being there, spending 800 Taka (about $12) on our lunches when his family probably could live off of that money for months.
That was my one regret of today. By trying to do something good for a kid, I’m not sure whether we were being generous or insulting. He was the most authoritative and cool little kid though. He almost acted like a hot shot, calling out to the waiters, insisting on counting out the cash, walking around with a strut.
We paid for lunch and walked along Cox’s Bazar, mostly in silence. The three of us were so different. I wished that one day I could meet up with this little kid and talk about the old days it used to be hard for him and his family, but I’m not sure that can ever happen.
I walked him to the bus stop and he apologetically told me he needed money for the bus ride back. I said sure, how much?
“50 Taka,” he said.
I was sure it only cost 30 Taka, if he even had to pay to get on the bus. But I gave him fifty anyway, deciding to trust him and besides, does it matter to me, and is it wrong of him to skim money off of me when it’s so little to me and so much for him?
I don’t really know.